Lecture 10

10. The Soul as Form of the Body: Three Divisions

Summary
Berquist guides students through Aristotle’s method of investigating the definition of the soul by division rather than enumeration. The lecture covers three divisions on the side of the soul (substance vs. accident, form vs. matter, first act vs. second act) and three divisions on the side of the body (natural vs. artificial, living vs. non-living, organized vs. disorganized). The discussion establishes the soul as substantial form—the actualizing principle of a living, organized body—while addressing why the soul cannot be understood as either a complete independent substance or merely the body’s organization.

Listen to Lecture

Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript

Lecture Notes

Main Topics #

Why Division Rather Than Enumeration? #

  • The soul is not directly accessible to sense experience like mathematical objects
  • Unlike recognizing multiple squares by comparison, we cannot observe and compare multiple souls
  • Division allows us to systematically distinguish the soul from other things and understand its relationship to the body
  • Aristotle employs this method in the Posterior Analytics for investigating definitions of imperceptible realities

The Soul as Something of Another #

  • The soul cannot be defined as a complete independent substance (like a “ghost in the machine”)
  • The soul requires an organized body and is inseparable from living matter
  • This is parallel to how time is something of motion (yet not motion itself) and health is something of a living body (yet not identical to it)
  • When the body loses its organization, the soul departs

Three Divisions on the Side of the Soul #

First Division: Substance vs. Accident #

  • The soul belongs to the genus of substance, not to the accidents (quantity, quality, relation, etc.)
  • Evidence: The soul performs vital activities (especially understanding) that suggest substantial existence
  • If the soul were merely a quality like harmony, it could not perform these independent operations
  • Socrates’ argument in Phaedo: the soul sometimes resists bodily inclinations, proving it is not simply the body’s harmony

Second Division: Matter vs. Form #

  • Within substance, the soul is form, not matter
  • Matter is pure potentiality; form is actuality
  • The soul is the organizing principle that actualizes the body’s potential to live
  • Just as the definition of a house involves both its formal aspect (shelter from elements) and its material aspect (stones, bricks, lumber), the soul as form requires organized matter

Third Division: First Act vs. Second Act #

  • The soul is a first act—a permanent form that actualizes the body’s potential for life
  • Operations (sensation, movement, thought) are second acts that flow from the first act
  • Example: When acquiring the science of geometry, the mind is actualized in first act; when actually thinking geometric theorems, this is second act
  • The soul remains even in sleep when second acts are suspended; it is the constant ground of vital operations
  • First acts endure; second acts come and go

Three Divisions on the Side of the Body #

First Division: Natural vs. Artificial Body #

  • The soul animates a natural body, not an artificial one
  • Natural bodies possess intrinsic principles of motion and change

Second Division: Living vs. Non-Living Natural Body #

  • The soul is of a living body specifically
  • Non-living natural bodies (stones, metals) do not possess souls

Third Division: Organized vs. Disorganized Body #

  • The body must be organized with proper structure and functioning parts
  • The soul requires a body with organs arranged in the correct way
  • When bodily organization is destroyed (decapitation, severe dismemberment, death), the soul cannot remain
  • This does not mean the soul is the organization, but that it requires organization to inhere in matter

Key Arguments #

The Soul is Substantial #

  • From Unity of Experience: When my body is injured or a limb is amputated, I experience this as happening to me, not to something alien within me—this unified experience suggests the soul and body form one substance
  • From Resistance to Bodily Inclinations: The soul sometimes opposes what the body desires, demonstrating it cannot be merely the body’s harmony or organization
  • From the Impossibility of Multiple Souls in Matter: If the soul were merely the body’s order, the dissolution of that order would dissolve the soul; but the soul’s capacity to resist order proves it is substantial

Why the Soul Cannot Be the Body’s Harmony #

  • A harmony or order cannot exist without the thing it orders (just as the order of letters cannot exist without the letters themselves)
  • Yet the soul demonstrates independent capacities (resistance, understanding) that suggest something more than mere arrangement
  • While the soul requires an organized body, it is not identical to that organization

Why the Soul Must Be First Act, Not Second Act #

  • The soul provides the permanent ground for all vital operations
  • Second acts come and go (sleeping, waking, moving, resting); first acts remain constant
  • Even when the body is not engaged in any operation, the soul persists as the actualization of the body’s life-potential
  • This explains how a living thing remains alive through periods of inactivity

Important Definitions #

Ψυχή (Psyche / Soul) #

  • The principle of life in living bodies
  • The cause of life within living bodies
  • The first act of a natural, organized, living body
  • That which actualizes the body’s potential for life

Substance (οὐσία) #

  • That which exists in itself, not in or through another
  • The fundamental category of being
  • Distinguished from accidents (quantity, quality, relation, time, place, etc.)

Form (εἶδος / Forma) #

  • The actualizing principle; the source of actuality in a composite being
  • In the case of the soul: the principle that makes a body alive and capable of vital operations
  • Contrasted with matter (pure potentiality)

Matter (ὕλη) #

  • Pure potentiality; the material substrate
  • That which is actualized by form
  • In living things: the organized body that is actualized by the soul

First Act (πρώτη ἐνέργεια / Actus Primus) #

  • The form itself; the actualization of potentiality
  • In the case of the soul: the permanent actualization of the body as living
  • Remains constant even when operations cease

Second Act (δεύτερη ἐνέργεια / Actus Secundus) #

  • The operation or activity flowing from a first act
  • Examples: sensing, moving, thinking, desiring
  • Comes and goes; not permanent like the first act

Examples & Illustrations #

The House Definition #

  • Formal Definition (by the natural philosopher): “A shelter preventing destruction by wind, rain, and heat”
  • Material Definition (by the natural philosopher): “Stones, bricks, and lumber”
  • The complete definition must include both formal and material aspects
  • This mirrors how the soul must be understood as form requiring organized matter

Health as Something of Another #

  • Health is something of a living body, not of stones or artificial objects
  • A doctor investigates health only by examining living bodies
  • Health itself is not a body but a disposition or condition of a living body
  • This parallels how the soul is something of a body without being identical to matter

Geometry and Science (Knowledge as First and Second Act) #

  • Before Learning: The mind is in potentiality regarding geometric knowledge
  • After Learning: The mind possesses the science of geometry (first act)
  • During Contemplation: When actually thinking about geometric theorems (second act)
  • In Sleep: The science remains (first act) even when not actively thinking (second act)
  • The science itself—the habit of knowledge—persists; operations based on it come and go

Time and Motion #

  • Time is something of motion without being motion itself
  • When we say time goes fast or slow, we must measure it by another time—a logical impossibility if time were itself motion
  • Yet time is not perceived without some motion occurring
  • This analogy shows how the soul is connected to bodily matter while not being identical to it

Blue Moon in the Liturgy (Context on Beauty and the Senses) #

  • Berquist gives the example of “Blue Moon” (a song from dance halls) being played during communion
  • This illustrates the distinction between operations of the soul that are degraded (second acts involving the senses) and the soul’s permanent capacity (first act)
  • Even when operations involving the body are corrupted or mediocre, the soul’s fundamental nature remains

Questions Addressed #

Is the soul a complete independent substance or something of another? #

  • Resolution: The soul is something of another (the body); it cannot exist or be understood apart from an organized living body
  • Evidence: The soul departs when the body loses its organization; the unity of human experience demonstrates integral composition

Is the soul the harmony or organization of the body? #

  • Resolution: No—but the soul requires an organized body
  • The soul is not the arrangement of parts but the actualizing principle that requires such arrangement
  • Socrates proves this: the soul resists bodily inclinations, which an arrangement of matter could not do

Why is division the proper method for investigating the soul’s definition? #

  • Resolution: Because the soul is imperceptible to sensation and not accessible through comparing multiple examples
  • Division systematically separates the soul from other things and reveals its relationship to the body
  • This follows Aristotle’s method in the Posterior Analytics

Does the soul belong to the category of substance or accident? #

  • Resolution: The soul is a substance (though not a complete independent substance)
  • Its vital activities and capacity for resistance to bodily inclinations demonstrate substantial existence
  • Unlike accidents (qualities, quantities), the soul cannot inhere in something else as a modification

Is the soul matter or form? #

  • Resolution: The soul is form, not matter
  • Matter is pure potentiality; the soul actualizes the body’s potential for life
  • The soul is the organizing principle, the source of actuality in the living composite

Is the soul a first act or a second act? #

  • Resolution: The soul is a first act; its operations (sensing, thinking, moving) are second acts
  • The soul is the permanent actualization of the body as living
  • Second acts come and go; the first act remains constant
  • This explains how the soul persists through sleep, rest, and periods of inactivity

Connections to Prior Discussion #

From the Discussion of Emotions (Passions) #

  • Anger (θυμός / thumos) involves both bodily aspect (blood and heat around the heart) and formal aspect (appetite for retribution)
  • This demonstrated why natural philosophy must consider the soul insofar as it is in matter
  • The present lecture explains why: the soul is substantial form requiring organized matter

From the Discussion of God’s Perfections #

  • God is spoken of metaphorically as having anger (involving the irascible part) but not literally having hunger or thirst
  • This reflects the distinction between operations that involve bodily matter (second acts) and the soul’s capacity for resistance and judgment
  • The soul as first act explains why certain operations can be attributed metaphorically but others cannot

From the Psalm Discussion (Psalm 63) #

  • “My flesh pines and my soul thirsts… to see your power and your glory”
  • The flesh (bodily aspect) and soul (formal aspect) together express the human person’s longing for God
  • “Power” (δύναμις) connects to resurrection of the body; “Glory” (δόξα) connects to the vision of God
  • This illustrates the unity of body and soul in human existence and aspiration