Lecture 31

31. The Soul-Spirit Distinction and Interior Sensing

Summary
This lecture explores the fundamental distinction between soul (anima) and spirit (pneuma) through both theological and philosophical lenses, focusing on St. Paul’s epistle to the Corinthians and Thomas Aquinas’s commentary. Berquist examines how the human person can be characterized as either ‘animalis’ (concentrated on bodily powers) or ‘spiritualis’ (elevated by God’s Spirit), and begins Aristotle’s investigation of interior sensing powers that must unify and reflect upon the five exterior senses.

Listen to Lecture

Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript

Lecture Notes

Main Topics #

The Soul-Spirit Distinction #

  • Soul (anima): The form of the body; possesses powers that are acts of bodily organs, particularly the sensitive powers
  • Spirit (pneuma): Those powers of the soul that transcend the body—intellect and will; not reducible to bodily powers
  • The soul is not simply a spirit imprisoned in a body, but the very form that animates and makes the body alive
  • A person can be “animalis” (soulish/natural) when concentrated on bodily and sensory powers, or “spiritualis” (spiritual) when elevated by God’s Spirit

St. Paul’s Teaching on the Natural vs. Spiritual Man (1 Corinthians 2:14-15) #

  • The animalis homo (natural man, Greek: ψυχικός/psychikos) cannot receive spiritual things because he judges by:
    • Sensory images of bodies
    • The letter of the law
    • Philosophical reason alone (derived from sensory knowledge)
  • The spiritualis homo (spiritual man) judges all things through:
    • Intellect enlightened by God’s Spirit
    • Will inflamed by God’s love
    • Direct reception of spiritual truth

Mary’s Magnificat as Illustration #

  • “My soul magnifies the Lord” (bodily dimension)—refers to her role in bearing the Word made flesh, involving bodily reproductive powers
  • “My spirit rejoices in God my Savior” (immaterial dimension)—refers to intellect and will, the only powers capable of having God himself as their direct object
  • Only spirit can directly receive God through the theological virtues: faith (intellect), hope (will), and charity (will)

Aristotle’s Investigation of the Five Senses (De Anima 3.1) #

The Question of Additional Senses #

  • Aristotle argues (with probability but not necessity) that there are only five outward senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch
  • Touch seems to know all tangible qualities because it pertains to the basic material qualities: hot, cold, wet, dry
  • Other senses operate through mediums:
    • Sight: operates through air and water (transparency)
    • Hearing: operates through air
    • Smell: operates through air or water
    • Touch: operates directly (no medium)

The Elemental Basis of Sense Organs #

  • Sense organs are composed of only two of the four basic elements:
    • Eye (sight): water (the pupil)
    • Ear (hearing): air
    • Nose (smell): air or water
    • Fire: not characteristic of any specific organ, but common to all (necessary warmth/energy)
    • Earth: not characteristic of any specific organ, though involved in touch
  • Since all animals with perfect sensory development have organs made from air and water, we can conclude all senses are possessed by non-defective animals

The Common Sensibles Problem #

  • Someone might think there is another outward sense that knows common sensibles (motion, rest, shape, figure, magnitude, number, unity)
  • But common sensibles are not the proper object of a separate sense; rather, they are known accidentally through the five senses
  • Example: I know the shape of a table through sight (via color boundaries) and through touch (via hardness)
  • Unlike sweetness, which is accidental to sight (I can be fooled by sugar’s appearance), shape is not accidental to these senses—it is known through them directly

Key Arguments #

The Language and Translation Problem #

  • The Greek word ψυχικός (psychikos) literally means “souled” or “soulish,” not simply “animal”
  • Translating it as “animal man” loses the crucial reference to the soul (anima) and can mislead modern readers
  • The distinction between ψυχή (psyche—soul) and ζῷον (zoon—animal/life) reflects different semantic fields

The Soul as Form of the Body #

  • Thomas Aquinas grounds the distinction in the fundamental definition: the soul is the form of the body
  • Because the soul has powers that are acts of bodily organs, a purely spiritual being (like an angel) would not have these powers
  • Therefore, calling someone “animalis” means they are concentrated in their judgment and desire on these bodily powers
  • This concentration—not the mere possession of bodily powers—characterizes the natural man

Knowledge Through Multiple Senses #

  • The same object can be known through different senses in different ways:
    • Shape known through color by sight
    • Shape known through hardness by touch
  • This principle demonstrates that knowledge is not enslaved to a single method
  • The mind can abstract and distinguish what experience never separates (e.g., shape from color) by having multiple sensory access points
  • This extends to faith and reason: the same truth can be known by reason (philosophy) and by faith (theology), though not in the same way

The Problem of Common Sensibles as Accidental #

  • If common sensibles were the proper object of a separate sense, they would be accidental to the five senses, like sweetness is accidental to sight
  • But we do not experience them that way: shape is essential to both sight and touch in a way that sweetness is not essential to sight
  • Therefore, no separate sense organ for common sensibles exists
  • This implies an interior power must unify and reflect upon the sensations of all five senses

Important Definitions #

Animalis (Natural/Soulish) #

  • One who follows the sensible powers of both knowing (vis apprehensiva) and desiring (vis appetitiva)
  • In the cognitive dimension: judges spiritual things by sensory images, literal interpretation of law, or philosophical reasoning alone
  • In the appetitive dimension: follows dissolute and lascivious desires, uncontained by the higher powers of spirit
  • Represents the human person concentrated on bodily existence

Spiritualis (Spiritual) #

  • One whose intellect (understanding) is enlightened by God’s Spirit and whose will is inflamed by God’s love
  • Subject to God’s Spirit and faithfully knows spiritual things
  • Lives a rectified life with the Spirit of God
  • Can receive and judge spiritual things
  • Represents the human person elevated by grace

Common Sensibles (κοινὰ αἰσθητά) #

  • Objects of sensation that are known by more than one sense, not by any single sense exclusively:
    • Motion (κίνησις)
    • Rest (στάσις)
    • Shape/Figure (σχῆμα)
    • Magnitude/Size (μέγεθος)
    • Number (ἀριθμός)
    • Unity/Continuity (ἕν)
  • Distinguished from proper sensibles (color for sight, sound for hearing, etc.)

Proper Sensibles #

  • Objects known by only one sense:
    • Sight: color
    • Hearing: sound
    • Smell: odor
    • Taste: flavor
    • Touch: tangible qualities (hot, cold, wet, dry)

Medium (μέσον) #

  • The element through which a sense operates:
    • Air and water are transparent and serve as mediums for sight and hearing
    • Touch operates without a medium (direct contact)

Examples & Illustrations #

Sugar and Salt #

  • Both appear white to the eye (same color)
  • One tastes sweet, the other tastes salty (different tastes)
  • We clearly distinguish between white-and-sweet and white-and-salty
  • No single exterior sense knows both color and taste, yet we unify these sensations
  • Shows the necessity of an interior power beyond the five senses

The Shape of the Table #

  • The eye knows the shape through the boundaries of color (where the green stops)
  • The hand knows the shape through the hardness and surface texture
  • Unlike sweetness (which is accidental to sight), shape is not accidental but known through both senses appropriately
  • Demonstrates how the same object can be known in different ways through different senses

The Chocolate Cake #

  • One looks at a richly decorated cake in a French bakery and thinks “that looks sweet”
  • But this is not the eye’s proper knowledge; it’s accidental guessing based on memory
  • If salt were secretly placed in the sugar bowl, the eye would be completely deceived
  • Shows that sweetness is accidentally known by sight, unlike shape

The Mole with Eyes #

  • Even the mole, which lives underground and appears eyeless, actually has eyes beneath its skin
  • This shows that even defective animals retain all the senses
  • Suggests that if no other bodily element existed to serve as a sense organ, no sense would be missing

Language and Custom #

  • English seems like the natural way of speaking to native speakers
  • One cannot separate “language” from “English” without learning another language
  • Only by encountering French, German, or other languages does one realize what is peculiar about English idioms
  • Similarly, the mind cannot separate concepts never separated in experience without multiple perspectives
  • Travel broadens the mind by providing alternative experiences

King Lear and Cordelia #

  • The phrase “She’s dead, dead is earth” illustrates the association of death with the element earth
  • Fire is associated with life and spirit (“give up the ghost,” “give up the air”)
  • Water is associated with life but not typically with the soul
  • Earth is what remains and returns after death—“dust thou art, and to dust thou shalt return”

Questions Addressed #

How should we translate ψυχικός? #

  • Not simply as “animal man” but as “soulish man” or “natural man” to preserve the reference to anima (soul)
  • The Greek term explicitly refers to the soul, not to animal nature generally

Why does Paul call the man who rejects spiritual truth “soulish” (animalis)? #

  • Thomas answers by returning to the definition of soul as the form of the body
  • Because this man is concentrated on bodily powers, he is called “soulish”—one who follows the sensitive powers
  • If he had only immaterial powers (intellect and will), he would be a pure spirit like an angel
  • The concentration on bodily powers defines him as animalis

How can we distinguish different sensible qualities when no single sense knows both? #

  • Example: we distinguish red from sweet, though sight knows red but not sweet, and taste knows sweet but not red
  • This requires an interior power that receives impressions from multiple senses
  • This interior power must be more immaterial than the exterior senses
  • It is called the “common sense” (sensus communis)

Can the same object be known in different ways? #

  • Yes: shape can be known by sight (through color) and by touch (through hardness)
  • This shows knowledge is not univocal but admits of different modes
  • Extends to the principle that faith and reason can both know the same truth differently
  • Same truth, different ways of knowing

Are there more than five senses? #

  • Aristotle argues there are not—though his argument is probable rather than necessary
  • All sense organs are made from air and water, all animals have access to these mediums, therefore all senses are had by perfect animals
  • The common sensibles are not the proper object of a sixth sense
  • But there must be interior powers (not exterior senses) that unify the five senses

Notable Quotes #

“The soul is the form of the body. Whence, those powers are property of the soul, which are the acts of bodily organs, namely the sensitive powers.” — Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on 1 Corinthians 2:14

“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.” — Mary, Magnificat (Luke 1:46-47), interpreted to distinguish bodily from immaterial powers

“Those men, therefore, are called animalis, who follow these powers… the knowing or grasping power and the desiring power.” — Thomas Aquinas, on who is called animalis