20. Truth, Wisdom, and First Causes in Aristotle
Summary
Listen to Lecture
Subscribe in Podcast App | Download Transcript
Lecture Notes
Main Topics #
Truth as Both Easy and Difficult #
- Aristotle’s paradox: knowing truth is in some ways easy, in other ways difficult
- Three ways truth is easy:
- Everyone encounters some truth through their occupation or daily activities (the hamburger maker learns about hamburgers)
- Large amounts of truth accumulate through the contributions of many people (“many hands make light work”)
- Some truths are universally known and impossible to avoid (e.g., substance vs. quantity distinction that everyone grasps intuitively)
- The difference from what seems naive: Aristotle carefully distinguishes what makes truth easy, showing this is not obvious or simplistic
Aristotle’s Method: Clarifying Pre-existing Knowledge #
- Aristotle’s philosophy clarifies thoughts that people already have in an indistinct, confused way
- Example: The man in the street knows that “what a man is” differs from “the size of a man,” reflecting the distinction between substance and quantity (the first two Aristotelian categories)
- This is why Aristotelian philosophy is “philosophy, period” rather than one man’s invented system
- Contrast with modern philosophers whose ideas are “their philosophy” rather than true philosophy
The Cause of Difficulty in Knowing Truth #
- The difficulty of truth has different causes in different sciences:
- Natural philosophy is more difficult than geometry because the things studied “hardly exist” (motion, time, matter in flux). The defect is in the things themselves, not in us.
- Wisdom/First philosophy is more difficult than geometry not because of defects in the things (which are most illuminating) but because of weakness in our minds
- Augustine’s paradox on time: “If nobody asks me what time is, I know what it is. But if somebody asks me, I don’t know”
- The most intelligible things are most obscure to us due to our intellectual weakness
Why Truth Belongs Most to the Wise Man #
First distinction: Theoretical (speculative/looking) knowledge vs. Practical knowledge
- The end (goal/purpose) of theoretical knowledge is truth itself
- The end of practical knowledge is action/doing, not truth
- Since the end is what is most important about anything, truth pertains far more to theoretical knowledge than practical knowledge
Second distinction: Practical knowledge considers truths that are often temporary and relative
- Example: England’s allies and enemies change with circumstance (France was enemy in Napoleonic Wars, ally in WWI and WWII)
- Such truths are “sometimes true and sometimes not true,” making them less true than eternal truths
- Eternal truths (e.g., a triangle’s interior angles equal right angles) are more true than contingent truths
Among theoretical sciences: Wisdom is most concerned with truth because it deals with first causes, and first causes are most true
The Principle of Causality #
- Core principle: If the same property belongs to two things, and one is the cause of the other possessing it, then the property belongs more to the cause
- The cause is most of all what the property is said of
Simple examples:
- Fire is hot, and air around fire is hot, but air is hot because of the fire → fire is hotter
- Water is wet, cloth is wet, but cloth is wet because of water → water is wetter
- Sugar is sweet, coffee is sweet, but coffee is sweet because of sugar → sugar is sweeter
Applied to truth:
- If an effect is true, it is true because of its cause
- Therefore, the cause is more true than the effect
- If the cause itself has a cause, that prior cause is even more true
- Conclusion: The first cause is most true
First Causes and Being #
- Key corollary: “Whence is each thing towards being, so also is it towards truth”
- Being and truth are correlated: primacy in being entails primacy in truth
- Connection to revelation: God says “I am who am” (primacy in being) and “I am truth itself” (primacy in truth)
- This makes metaphysical sense to Aristotle as a philosopher—the first cause must be first in both being and truth
The Structure of Wisdom’s Investigation #
- Berquist identifies a “subplot” structure in Books I-II of the Metaphysics
- Book I (main plot): Establishes that there are four kinds of causes
- Book II (subplot): Establishes that there are first causes in each kind of cause
- Books III-X: Consider other matters (being, unity, etc.) as preparation for fuller knowledge
- Books XI-XIV: Return to much more complete understanding of what the first cause is
- This mirrors the structure of the Nicomachean Ethics:
- Book I: defines happiness (ἐυδαιμονία)
- Books II-IX: examines virtues
- Book X: redefines happiness more fully and completely
Key Arguments #
Why Wisdom Must Be About First Causes #
- Premise 1: The end (purpose) of theoretical knowledge is truth itself
- Premise 2: Truth pertains far more to theoretical than practical knowledge
- Premise 3: Among theoretical sciences, wisdom deals with first causes
- Premise 4: If the same property belongs to both cause and effect, it belongs more to the cause
- Applied to truth: First causes are most true because effects are true through their causes
- Conclusion: The consideration of truth belongs most of all to the wise man
The Role of Predecessors in Knowing Truth #
- We are helped not only by those we agree with but also by those we disagree with
- With disagreeing positions, we must refute them, which develops our understanding
- Example: Aristotle’s engagement with Parmenides and Melissus (who deny multiplicity and change) develops understanding even though their positions are absurd
Important Definitions #
Key Terms #
- Theoretical/Speculative knowledge (θεωρία/speculativa): Knowledge whose end is truth itself; considers eternal, unchanging things. Sometimes translated as “looking” knowledge.
- Practical knowledge (πρακτική): Knowledge whose end is action; considers particular, changing circumstances and useful truths
- First cause (πρώτη αἰτία): That which is the cause of being/property for other things but has no cause itself; most true, most being, most intelligible in itself
- Philosophy (φιλοσοφία): The reasoned-out knowledge of truth; wisdom has the greatest claim to this name
- Wisdom (σοφία): The knowledge of first causes; what a lover of wisdom (philosopher) pursues
- Moved mover (κινοῦν κινούμενον): Something that causes motion only insofar as it is itself moved or changed
Examples & Illustrations #
The Hamburger Maker #
- A person making hamburgers will discover truths about hamburgers (they shrink when cooked) regardless of their goal
- Illustrates how everyone necessarily encounters some truth through their occupation
The Distinction Between Substance and Quantity #
- Asking the man in the street: “Is what a man is and the size of a man the same thing? No.”
- Same question about dogs
- Shows people already know intuitively the distinction between substance and quantity (the first two categories)
- Aristotle clarifies what people already understand confusedly
England’s Changing Allies #
- Napoleon era: France is England’s enemy
- World Wars I and II: France is England’s ally
- Illustrates how practical truths change with circumstances
- Contrast with eternal mathematical truths like the triangle’s angles
Fire and Hot Air #
- Fire is hot; air around fire is hot
- Air’s heat comes from the fire
- Therefore fire is hotter than the heated air
- Simple illustration of how properties belong more to their cause
The Boxer and the Gloves #
- A champion boxer’s gloves knock someone out; the person is knocked out
- But it’s not really the gloves—it’s the boxer who knocked them out
- The gloves knocked them out because of the boxer
- The boxer is more truly “the one who knocked you out” than the gloves are
- Illustrates the principle applied to causality in action
Notable Quotes #
“Aristotle’s philosophy is not Aristotle’s philosophy. It is philosophy, period.” — Berquist, distinguishing Aristotle from modern philosophers
“If you ask the man in the street, is what a man is and the size of a man the same thing? No.” — Berquist, on how Aristotle clarifies pre-existing knowledge
“If nobody asks me what time is, I know what it is. But if somebody asks me, I don’t know.” — Augustine (via Berquist), on the paradox of understanding time
“Many hands make light work.” — Berquist’s mother (cited by Berquist), illustrating how truth accumulates through many contributions
“The business of the teacher is to encourage the student.” — Dion (Berquist’s teacher, cited by Berquist), on balancing hope and fear in education
Questions Addressed #
Why is it appropriate for the wise man to discuss how man is towards truth? #
- The consideration of truth belongs most of all to the wise man
- Wisdom is about first causes, and first causes are most true
- The wise man directs all other inquiry, so he should consider this fundamental question
How can truth be both easy and difficult? #
- Easy: Everyone encounters some truth; truth accumulates through many; some truths are universally recognized
- Difficult: But the cause of difficulty is different—in us (our weakness) for divine/first causes; in the things themselves for natural philosophy
Why do first causes have the greatest claim to being “most true”? #
- Effects possess truth only because of their causes
- What belongs more to the cause than to the effect is true in a fuller, more primary way
- Applying this principle successively up a causal chain leads to the first cause being most true
How does Aristotle’s method clarify rather than invent? #
- He takes what people already know confusedly and brings it to clear understanding
- Example: Everyone knows substance ≠ quantity; Aristotle articulates this as the distinction between the first two categories
- This is why his philosophy is universal, not peculiar to Aristotle
What is the relationship between being and truth? #
- Each thing is towards truth in the same way it is towards being
- Primacy in being and primacy in truth both belong to the first cause
- This explains why God is “I am” (being) and “I am truth” (truth)